Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Administrator, Curator, or StaffJeff Kaplan Date: May 12, 2013 11:11am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: not re-deriving

should be done now. the checksum files were not corrupt so much as incorrect because you added new files. generally checksum files are no longer required.

Terms of Use (31 Dec 2014)